So, was Podcasting invented a year and a half ago? I don't think so. I think the term was coined a year and a half ago. There have been typical radio shows on the internet, and just because you didn't listen to them on your iPod, hence podcasting, does not mean they weren't just that. Amateur radio, for that matter, has been on the internet for a long time. Sound bytes -- again, same thing. So why, then, does Al Gore get all the glory of the Internet? That's a pretty good question.
"These are heady days for wannabe radio stars. Only 17 months old, podcasting -- the technology that makes it easy for people to post audio recordings on the Web -- is stirring the creative juices of individuals around the world who are eager to dish up shows on everything from yoga to Nascar. Though it's difficult to track how many podcasts there are, Apple's iTunes alone lists 20,000 shows. And the number is expected to rise."
Of the 20,000 shows, or so, I would have to say more than half of them are because of Dawn and Drew. Does that mean they invented Podcasting? I don't think so. They heard of it from someone and thought they'd give it a try. Their pretty darn good at it too, in case you were wondering.
According to Wikipedia, that all-knowing site... Ah heck, I was going to type it out. I'll just paste it, so much easier.
"By 2003, web radio had existed for a decade, digital audio players had been on the market for several years, blogs and broadcasters frequently published MP3 audio online, and RSS file formats were widely used for summarizing or syndicating Web content."
So web radio had been around for a long time. The only thing missing from the invention of "iPod Broadcasting" was the enclosure of media in RSS feeds. Well, enter Dave Winer. The genius. Somehow, Mr. Winer gets screwed everytime he invents something. I've heard his podcast, and it's interesting to hear him talk about the way things have been ripped from his grasp and mutilated as soon as they become popular. Anyway, Winer invents the Enclosure Tag. I huge step.
And then at the first BloggerCon this happens --
"At the first Harvard BloggerCon conference, October 4-October 5, 2003, Kevin Marks demonstrated a script to download RSS enclosures to iTunes and synchronise them onto an iPod[6], something Adam Curry had been doing with Radio Userland and Applescript."
As you can see, Curry's name pops up again. And, ladies and gentlemen, if you look to your left, you'll see Gore! Oh wait, that was just a bush. So I bring up Gore and Curry because I think the real innovator of what we now know as Podcasting was not Curry, but Winer. A little help from Kevin Marks and Adam Curry, but mostly Winer. And where is he when a discussion happens about the history of podcasting? No where. He's left out. Adam Curry is given all the credit. The Podfather invented it all.
Now, I don't want to sound like I'm bagging on Curry. There's so many good things about him, as long as you can past the hair. ;) As you can plainly see above, he'd been doing pretty much the same thing with Applescript beforehand. And don't forget about what he's done since then, either. He has never, from what I've heard on Daily Source Code, heard him claim to have invented Podcasting. He isn't trying to take the glory, it's being handed to him because he's the one doing all the legwork. Curry has promoted podcasting in such a way that it's come from a hobby for some to a hobby for many and a job for others. Where will he help to bring it next? Well, with Podshow and the PodSafe Network, you just never know.
Which makes me think... Where has Dave Winer been through all of the last 17 months? He just never gets any attention after the initial launch of his ideas. Maybe that'll be the next step in my wanderings.
3 comments:
I think what allowed Podcasting to take off is the combination of mp3 audio, the popularity of the iPod, the on-demand aspects of RSS and then finally the iTunes support this year.
Another aspect has been original programing. Things like the Mac Cast, Dawn and Drew and This Week In Tech have been shows worth listening to. Back when internet radio was just some guy in his basement playing lame jazz tapes on a streaming feed it wasn't worth dealing with.
At the end of the day I enjoy the fact that I can listen to NPR, Fanboy Radio or the Podcasts, anywhere I go at anytime I want. Internet radio simply combined the frustration of commercial radio with the annoyance of having to stream live.
As for Adam Curry, I don't know. I hadn't heard of him at all before Podcasting, not having MTV and all, and for some reason I just don't feel great about his whole Podshow thing. No real reason, just something feels off about it. Granted that's from the outside looking in, so it's totally baseless.
I believe the podcasting support from iTunes was a huge contributing factor, also. How many millions of people see the podcast link each week? Being the number 7 music seller in North America means it's probably a lot.
This morning, when I read this after just waking up, that line about the jazz tapes had me rolling on the floor. That's some funny stuff. There have, however, been better shows available for a while. Free Talk Live (I believe) has, and still is, a radio show that has been available on the net for years. I think you've been able to download Stern's stuff for a long time too, but I'm not sure if that was through proper channels. I'm wondering if Opie and Anthony have been doing the same thing too. My point is, there were shows before, but I read the sarcastic humour in what you wrote :)
Do you think PodShow and the PodSquad feels a bit like a Gentlemen's club? Snooty, invite only, holier than thou? It's the vibe I get, anyway.
Stern's stuff's probably not going to be for DL much longer, if it is now, because of his swtich to sat radio they're paying him so much they want subscribers. With terestial radio the ads drive revenue so it makes a bit more sense to let them do it free online. Though you might be right and it might be less than legal.
And yeah that's the vibe I get from it. I like the Leo Laporte model of "I do a Podcast and I'm going to get my friends doing them" building a bunch of 'casters out of the old Tech TV crowd but that feels natural.
The Podshow way seems much more of sort of gloming onto successful Podcasters and monatizing their work. Which I guess is good. In the example of Dawn and Drew it's allowed Drew to quit his day job.
Which for them is great, but as a listener I haven't noticed a leap forward in quality or anything.
I don't know, Podcasting is really nice because it's unique and sort of a thing where if you like thing 'x' you can find a Podcast about it. When money gets really involved you'll find a lot more people copying popular Podcasts, a lot of unique ones not really being successful money-wise and so maybe not sticking around as long as they would have before there was the expectation of cash.
Post a Comment